Incidence Of Adverse Events Research Articles

Preliminary efficacy and safety of YSCH-01 in patients with advanced solid tumors: an investigator-initiated trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of YSCH-01 (Recombinant L-IFN adenovirus) in subjects with advanced solid tumors.MethodsIn this single-center, open-label, investigator-initiated trial of YSCH-01, 14 patients with advanced solid...

Chemoradiotherapy versus surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with stage III NSCLC: a real-world multicenter retrospective study.

The optimal treatment after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy and surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in stage III NSCLC. We conducted a real-world multicenter retrospective study on patients with stage III NSCLC who received surgery or chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between October 2018 and December 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed from the initiation of neoadjuvant treatment and estimated by the Kaplan‒Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to examine potential prognostic factors. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was used to further minimize confounding. A total of 239 eligible patients were enrolled, with 104 (43.5%) receiving surgery and 135 (56.5%) receiving CRT. After 1:1 PSM, 1- and 2-year PFS rates in patients receiving radical surgery (rSurgery group) vs. patients receiving definitive cCRT (dCCRT group) were 80.0% vs. 79.2% and 67.2% vs. 53.1%, respectively (P = 0.774). One- and 2-year OS rates were 97.5% vs. 97.4% and 87.3% vs. 89.9%, respectively (P = 0.558). Patients in the dCCRT group had a numerically lower incidence of distant metastases compared to those in the rSurgery group (42.9% vs. 70.6%, P = 0.119). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in both groups, except that the incidence of grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was significantly higher in the dCCRT group (30.0% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.025). Following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy may achieve noninferior outcomes to radical surgery in stage III NSCLC.

Patient-reported outcomes of topical finasteride/minoxidil treatment for male androgenetic alopecia: A retrospective study using telemedical data.

Oral finasteride and topical minoxidil are the current standard of care for male androgenetic alopecia and a combination of the two treatments can be considered for greater efficacy. Clinical trials of topical finasteride have also yielded promising results, but routine care data are lacking. To examine patient-reported outcomes of men with androgenetic alopecia who received topical finasteride admixed with minoxidil compared to the current standard of care (oral finasteride). Retrospective, cross-sectional study with data from a German direct-to-consumer teledermatology platform between December 2021 and January 2023. Patient-reported outcomes were collected through voluntary follow-up questionnaires provided after 6 weeks on topical finasteride/minoxidil or oral finasteride treatment. A total of 1545 patients who received topical finasteride/minoxidil treatment were included; 238 (15.4%) participated in the follow-up questionnaire. At week six, 62.2% (148/238) reported positive changes in their hair appearance, and 44.1% (105/238) reported an improvement of self-esteem. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 11.8% (28/238). Full treatment adherence was observed in 74.4% (177/238). Comparing the topical treatment group to those receiving oral finasteride, lower treatment adherence was reported, along with higher rates of local adverse events; no difference was found in the incidence of sexual adverse events. Based on patient-reported outcomes, topical finasteride/minoxidil seems to be effective and well tolerated, but not superior to oral finasteride. Lower treatment adherence for topical usage must be considered when considering treatment options. Additional real-world data are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical finasteride/minoxidil.

[Analysis of the application effect and safety of transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange technique in hysteroscopic diagnostic and therapeutic surgery].

Objective: To investigate the effect and safety of transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) technique in hysteroscopic diagnostic and therapeutic surgery. Methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 100 female patients undergoing hysteroscopy surgery at Beijing Tongren Hospital from September to December 2023 were selected and randomly divided into two groups by the random number table method: the THRIVE group and the mask oxygen group, with 50 patients in each group. Patients in both groups were given total intravenous anesthesia with propofol combined with remifentanil and preserved spontaneous respiration. The THRIVE group was given oxygen by the THRIVE device with an oxygen flow rate of 50 L/min, while the mask oxygen group was given oxygen by the mask with an oxygen flow rate of 5 L/min; the oxygen concentration of both groups was set at 100%. The general condition of the patients, vital signs during the operation, the amount of anesthesia drugs used and the operation time were recorded. The primary observation index was the incidence of hypoxic events in the two groups; the secondary observation indexes were the incidence and time of intraoperative apnea as well as the corresponding oxygenation interventions and the incidence of non-hypoxic adverse events. Results: The age of the THRIVE group was (42±14) years, and the age of the mask oxygen group was (43±15) years. The duration of surgery in the THRIVE group was (15.9±3.4) min, which was statistically lower than that of the mask oxygen group (16.3±4.5) min (P=0.041), and there were no differences observed in the duration of awakening time and anesthesia time (both P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the dosage of propofol, remifentanil, and intraoperative vasoactive drugs between the two groups (all P>0.05). The SpO2 of the patients in the THRIVE group at the end of the operation was (99.7±1.1) %, which was higher than that of the mask-oxygen group (99.1±1.1) % (P<0.05). There was no difference in SpO2 of the two groups at the other time points (all P>0.05). There were no differences in HR and MAP of two group patients at each time point (all P>0.05). The incidence of hypoxic events in the THRIVE group was 12.0% (6/50), which was lower than that of 28.0% (14/50) in the mask oxygen group (P=0.045). The difference in the incidence and duration of apnea between the two groups was not statistically significant (all P>0.05). There were no cases of temporary need for laryngeal mask or tracheal intubation during surgery in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative body movement, dizziness, nausea and vomiting between the two groups (all P>0.05), and no cardiac, cerebral, renal or other important organ insufficiency occurred in the two weeks after surgery. Conclusion: THRIVE technology can provide effective oxygenation for patients undergoing hysteroscopic diagnosis and treatment, maintain patients' circulatory stability, and improve the safety and efficiency of surgery.

ATR inhibitor, camonsertib, dose optimization in patients with biomarker-selected advanced solid tumors (TRESR study).

Camonsertib is a selective oral inhibitor of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase with demonstrated efficacy in tumors with DNA damage response gene deficiencies. On-target anemia is the main drug-related toxicity typically manifesting after the period of dose-limiting toxicity evaluation. Thus dose/schedule optimization requires extended follow-up to assess prolonged treatment effects. Long-term safety/tolerability and antitumor efficacy of three camonsertib monotherapy dose levels/schedules were assessed in the TRESR study dose-optimization phase: 160 mg once daily (QD) 3 days on/4 off (160 3/4; the preliminary recommended phase II dose [RP2D]) and two step-down groups of 120 mg QD 3/4 (120 3/4) and 160 mg QD 3/4, 2 weeks on/1 off (160 3/4, 2/1w). Safety endpoints included incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), dose modifications, and transfusions. Efficacy endpoints included overall response rate, clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, and circulating-tumor-DNA (ctDNA)-based molecular response rate. The analysis included 119 patients: 160 3/4 (n = 67), 120 3/4 (n = 25), and 160 3/4, 2/1w (n = 27) treated up to 117.1 weeks as of the data cutoff. The risk of developing grade 3 anemia was significantly lower in the 160 3/4, 2/1w group compared with the preliminary RP2D group (HR = 0.23, 2-sided P = .02), translating to reduced transfusion and dose reduction requirements. The intermittent weekly schedule did not compromise antitumor activity. The 160 3/4, 2/1w dose was established as an optimized regimen for future camonsertib monotherapy studies offering significantly reduced anemia incidence without any compromise to efficacy.

Adverse effects of therapeutic phlebotomies: Prospective study of 587 procedures.

Therapeutic phlebotomy (TP), a widely used medical procedure, can be performed on diverse patients with iron overload or polyglobulia. However, its adverse events are not well known as most of the information on phlebotomy is derived from healthy blood donors (0.1%-5.3%). In contrast, TP is applicable to a broader, more complex population with comorbidities and old age. To ascertain the incidence of adverse events in phlebotomies, we conducted a prospective study on patients who attended our Unit. We prospectively gathered data from patients referred to our Unit for TP. Data regarding demographics, health status, and adverse events within at least 24 h of phlebotomy were gathered via a structured questionnaire during each visit. Between August 2021 and September 2022, 189 patients underwent 587 procedures. Most patients were men, over 60 (57.3%) had comorbidities, and 93% underwent at least two procedures during the study period. Twenty patients (10.8%) presented 25 adverse events (4.3% of phlebotomies), usually vasovagal reactions, none of which were clinically relevant, and all were managed by nursing staff on site, with full patient recovery. The rate of adverse events (<5%) in patients undergoing TP was low and comparable to that seen in healthy blood donors. Consequently, even old patients and those with some comorbidities can safely undergo TP when the process is carefully managed.

Application of intranasal dexmedetomidine in magnetic resonance imaging of preterm infants: The ED50, efficacy and safety analysis.

Infants undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often require pharmacological sedation. Dexmedetomidine serves as a novel sedative agent that induces a unique unconsciousness similar to natural sleep, and therefore has currently been used as the first choice for sedation in infants and young children. To determine the 50% effective dose (ED50) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of intranasal dexmedetomidine for MRI in preterm and term infants, and to observe the incidence of adverse events. To explore whether there were differences in ED50 and 95%CI, heart rate (HR) and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), the induction time and wake-up time and the incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups, so as to provide guidance for clinical safe medication for the meanwhile. A total of 68 infants were prospectively recruited for MRI examination under drug sedation (1 week ≤ age ≤ 23 weeks or weight ≤ 5kg). The children were divided into 2 groups according to whether they had preterm birth experience (Preterm group, Atterm group). The Dixon up-and-down method was used to explore ED50. The basic vital signs of the 2 groups were recorded, and the heart rate and SpO2 were recorded every 5 minutes until the infants were discharged from the hospital. The induction time, wake-up time and adverse events were recorded. The ED50 (95%CI) of intranasal dexmedetomidine in the Preterm group and the Atterm group were 2.23 (2.03-2.66) μg/kg and 2.64 (2.49-2.83) μg/kg, respectively (P < .05). the wake-up time was longer in Preterm group (98.00min) than in Atterm group (81.00 min) (P < .05), the incidence of bradycardia in Preterm group was 3/33, which was higher than that in Atterm group (1/35). There was no difference in the induction time between the 2 groups (P > .05), and there was no significant difference in other adverse events. Intranasal dexmedetomidine can be safely used for sedation in preterm infants undergoing MRI. Compared with term infants, preterm infants have a lower dose of dexmedetomidine, a higher incidence of bradycardia, and a longer weak-up time.

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with targeted therapy and immunotherapy versus with targeted monotherapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The application of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with targeted therapy and immunotherapy (TACE-T-I) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has gained increasing attention. However, there are variations in the efficacy and safety outcomes between TACE-T-I versus TACE combined with targeted drugs (TACE-T). This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE-T-I versus TACE-T in unresectable HCC. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to August 21, 2023, for comparative studies on TACE-T-I versus TACE-T for unresectable HCC. Outcome measures included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). OS was the primary outcome of this study. Weighted mean difference (WMD) or hazard ratio (HR) was used as the pooled statistic for OS and PFS. Relative risk (RR) was employed as the pooled statistic for ORR, DCR and the incidence of TRAEs. And 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for all effect measures. Data analysis was conducted using Stata 14.0 software. The meta-analysis included 14 studies with 2144 patients. The pooled results showed that compared with patients in the TACE-T group, patients in the TACE-T-I group had higher ORR (RR = 1.61; 95%CI: 1.38-1.89) and DCR (RR = 1.17; 95%CI: 1.09-1.26). Patients in the TACE-T-I group experienced prolonged PFS (WMD = 3.08; 95%CI: 2.63-3.53) and OS (WMD = 5.76; 95%CI: 4.68-6.84). And the risk of disease progression (HR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.37-0.55) and death (HR = 0.43; 95%CI: 0.38-0.49) was lower in the TACE-T-I group. Common TRAEs included fever, pain, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, elevated ALT, elevated AST, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, proteinuria, and diarrhea. The incidence and severity of TRAEs in the TACE-T-I group were similar to those in the TACE-T group, with no significant differences (P > .05). Current evidence suggests that, on the basis of TACE combined with targeted therapy, the addition of immunotherapy provides better clinical efficacy and survival benefits for unresectable HCC patients, with good tolerability.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Atogepant Co-administered with Quinidine Gluconate in Healthy Participants: A Phase 1, Open-Label, Drug-Drug Interaction Study.

Atogepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, is approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. Atogepant is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein, organic anion transporting polypeptide transporters, and cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 and 2D6. Quinidine is a strong P-gp and CYP2D6 inhibitor. A phase 1 open-label study evaluated the effect of P-gp and CYP2D6 inhibition by quinidine on the pharmacokinetics of atogepant, and the safety and tolerability of atogepant and quinidine gluconate (QG) when co-administered and when given alone in 33 healthy adults. There was no significant change in the atogepant maximum plasma concentration with QG co-administration. The overall systemic exposure, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (from time 0 to time t or to infinity), of atogepant increased by 25% when co-administered with QG. However, such an increase was not considered clinically relevant. Atogepant did not alter the mean plasma concentration of quinidine at steady state. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was highest when QG was administered alone (42.4%), which was primarily due to QT prolongation. Most TEAEs reported were mild in severity and resolved within 1-2 days. Co-administration of atogepant with QG did not result in any unexpected tolerability findings in this phase 1 study in healthy participants. The increase in atogepant exposure during QG co-administration could be due to inhibition of CYP2D6 (a minor contributor to atogepant clearance) as well as inhibition of P-gp.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge with limited treatment success. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a potential treatment avenue, necessitating a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate their efficacy and safety. Adhering to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, culminating in the inclusion of studies focusing on the treatment of recurrent OC with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and analyzed using fixed or random effects models depending on heterogeneity levels. Our search yielded 1215 articles, with 6 meeting the inclusion criteria for final analysis. Studies varied in size and reported median age, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events. The meta-analysis showed improved Objective Response Rates (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), and PFS in patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The overall adverse event rate was 17.9%, indicating a need for careful patient selection and monitoring. No significant publication bias was detected, enhancing the reliability of our findings. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors offer a promising treatment option for recurrent OC, improving ORR, DCR, and PFS. However, the higher incidence of adverse events necessitates a cautious approach to their use. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, biomarker identification, and optimal combination therapies.

Abstract PS08-06: A Phase Ib/II Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of PM8002 (Anti-PD-L1 x VEGF-A Bispecific Antibody) in Combination with Nab-Paclitaxel for First Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Abstract Background: PD-L1 and VEGF play important roles in immune evasion and pro-tumor angiogenesis promoting cancer growth and metastasis. PM8002 is a bispecific antibody targeting PD-L1 and VEGF-A for treating cancer. Here, we present results from a Phase Ib/II study of PM8002 in combination with nab-paclitaxel in patients with locally-advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methods: 42 patients with locally-advanced or metastatic TNBC (without prior systemic treatment) were enrolled in this Phase Ib/II study to test the safety and efficacy of PM8002 in combination with nab-paclitaxel. The first 6 patients were enrolled during Phase Ib with safety as the primary endpoint, and the remaining patients were enrolled during Phase II with objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint. Each treatment cycle lasts 28 days. All patients received PM8002 at 20 mg/kg (Q2W) and nab-paclitaxel at 100 mg/m2 on the 1st, 8th, and 15th days of each cycle until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression were observed. Tumor responses were evaluated every 8 weeks according to RECIST 1.1. Safety was evaluated according to CTCAE 5.0. Nab-paclitaxel dose was reduced according to toxicity, while PM8002 dose was kept consistent according to body weight. PD-L1 expression in tumors was tested, and subgroup analysis of ORR data stratified by PD-L1 expression was also included. Results: As of June 30, 2023, 42 patients were treated and evaluated at least once for treatment efficacy. The median duration of drug exposure was 4.6 months (min, max: 2.0, 7.6). The best overall ORR was 76.2% (32/42), including 1 complete response (CR) and 31 partial responses (PRs) with 29 objective responses occurring at the patient's first evaluation. The confirmed ORR was 57.2% (24/42) and the overall disease control rate (DCR) was 95.2% (40/42). The median time to response (TTR) was 1.9 months (95% CI:1.8~2.0) and the median best percentage change from baseline for target lesions was -47.2% (Q1, Q3: -56.9%, -33.5%). Among 13 patients with PD-L1 combined positive scores (CPS) &amp;lt; 1, the best ORR and DCR were 69.2% (9/13) and 100.0% (13/13), respectively. Among 25 patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1, the best ORR and DCR were 80.0% (20/25) and 96.0% (24/25), respectively. Among 9 patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10, the best ORR and DCR were both 100.0% (9/9). At the cut-off date of data analysis, 38 patients were still on treatment with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 7.4 months (95% CI: 7.4~NA); 38 patients were censored due to no disease progression or death. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 95.2%, of which 26.2% were Grade 3 or 4; no Grade 5 TRAEs were observed. The incidence of drug-related TRAEs related to PM8002 was 92.9%, of which 23.8% were Grade 3 or 4. The incidence of drug-related TRAEs related to nab-paclitaxel was 95.2%, of which 26.2% were Grade 3 or 4. 1 patient (2.4%) reduced nab-paclitaxel dose due to diarrhea. 1 patient (2.4%) discontinued PM8002 and nab-paclitaxel treatment due to diarrhea. The most common TRAEs related to PM8002 and nab-paclitaxel included neutropenia (69.0%), leukocytopenia (59.5%), anemia (52.4%) and proteinuria (26.2%). The incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was 11.9%, which included hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, and rash. No ≥ Grade 3 irAEs were observed. AEs related to targeting VEGF were also analyzed, including hypertension 19.0% (4.8% at Grade 1, 11.9% at Grade 2, and 2.4% at Grade 3) and proteinuria 26.2% (9.5% at Grade 1, and 16.7% at Grade 2). Conclusions: Rapid, deep, and durable tumor responses were observed for the combination of PM8002 and nab-paclitaxel in patients with first line TNBC. PM8002 did not enhance toxicity that is typically observed for nab-paclitaxel. This Phase II study is still ongoing with plans for entering late-stage clinical development for solid tumors. Citation Format: Jiong Wu, Jian Zhang, Zhongsheng Tong, Qingyuan Zhang, Yong-Sheng Wang, Qiao Cheng, Xin Chen, Zhihua Li, Yongmei Yin. A Phase Ib/II Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of PM8002 (Anti-PD-L1 x VEGF-A Bispecific Antibody) in Combination with Nab-Paclitaxel for First Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS08-06.

Abstract PO5-04-01: Inetetamab combined with sirolimus and chemotherapy in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients with abnormal activation of Pi3k/Akt/mTOR pathway after trastuzumab treatment

Abstract Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of Inetetamab Combined with Sirolimus and Chemotherapy in the treatment of human epidermal factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive metastatic breast cancer patients with abnormal activation of Pi3k/Akt/mTOR (PAM) pathway after Trastuzumab treatment. Methods: This prospective multicenter clinical study enrolled HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients at the National Cancer Center in China from July 2021 to September 2022 with PAM pathway mutation confirmed by histology or peripheral blood genetic testing. The inclusion criteria included: 1) Recurrent and metastatic breast cancer patients with HER2 positive confirmed histologically; 2) ECOG PS score ≤ 2; 3) Patients who have progressed after previous treatment with Trastuzumab; 4) Patients with PAM pathway mutation confirmed by Genetic testing; 5) Patients' cardiac, pulmonary, liver and bone marrow functions are basically normal; 6) Patients voluntarily sign informed consent forms. The exclusion criteria included: 1) Patients previously treated with mTOR inhibitors or pyrotinib; 2) Patients who have used chronic Corticosteroid for more than 3 months or used Immunosuppressive drug within 4 weeks; 3) Patients with symptomatic central nervous system metastasis; 4) Patients with left ventricular Ejection fraction&amp;lt; 50% or clinical manifestations of obvious arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia, severe atrioventricular block, cardiac insufficiency, and severe valvular disease; 5)Diagnosed with other malignant tumors within five years. Patients were randomly divided into trial group and control group. The patients in the trial group received inetetamab combined with sirolimus and chemotherapy, and control group received pyrotinib and chemotherapy. RECISTv1.1 standard was used to evaluate the efficacy of patients. Descriptive statistics are used to summarize clinical pathological features. Kaplan Meier method was used to draw survival curves. Log-rank test was used to compare progression free survival (PFS) differences between groups. P&amp;lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results:A total of 59 HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients with abnormal activation of PAM pathway were included, of which 37 patients received the treatment of inetetamab group and 22 patients received the treatment of pyrotinib group. The median follow-up time was 5.33 months. In the intent-to-treat set, the median PFS of patients in the inetetamab group was 4.64 months, which was shorter than 5.69 months in the pyrotinib group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.51; HR=0.41; 95% CI, 0.12-1.45). The objective response rate (ORR) of the inetetamab group and the pyrotinib group were 28.1% and 29.4%, respectively. In terms of safety, the incidence of adverse events (AE) in the experimental group was (33/37) 89.1%, while (16/21) 76.2% in the control group. The incidence of AE above level 3 in the inetetamab group and pyrotinib group were (13/37) 35.1% and (3/21) 14.3%, respectively. Conclusion:For the metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer patients with abnormal activation of PAM pathway treated with trastuzumab previously, the combination of inetetamab with sirolimus and chemotherapy regimen are equivalent to the combination of pyrotinib and chemotherapy regimen. It demonstrated that combination of inetetamab with sirolimus and chemotherapy could be one of the treatment options for the metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Qiao Li, Dan Lv, Xiaoying Sun, Mengyuan Wang, Li Cai, Feng Liu, Chenghui Li, Jiuda Zhao, Jing Sun, Yehui Shi, Fei Ma. Inetetamab combined with sirolimus and chemotherapy in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients with abnormal activation of Pi3k/Akt/mTOR pathway after trastuzumab treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-04-01.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based immune combination therapy versus sorafenib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based immunotherapy (hereafter referred to as “combination immunotherapy”) compared with that of sorafenib in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsDatabases such as PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from the date of their establishment to September 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of combination immunotherapy versus sorafenib for the treatment of advanced HCC. Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies, extracted the data, and cross-checked the information. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 5 RCTs were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed the following: (1) Effectiveness. Compared to sorafenib, combination immunotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58 ~ 0.82, p &amp;lt; 0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS, HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50 ~ 0.78, p &amp;lt; 0.001) in patients with advanced HCC. (2) Safety. Both groups had comparatively high incidences of adverse events (AEs), but the difference in any treatment-related adverse events was not significant between the two arms (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.95 ~ 1.02, p = 0.34). The difference in the incidence of grade 1–2 adverse reactions was statistically significant (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49–0.90, p = 0.001). There were no differences in grade 3/4 TRAEs or grade 5 TRAEs (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 0.78 ~ 2.71, p = 0.24; OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.73 ~ 1.58, p = 0.71).ConclusionCombined immunotherapy can significantly prolong the OS and PFS of patients with advanced HCC without increasing the incidence of adverse effects in terms of safety, but the incidence of AEs in different systems is different.

Abstract PO1-05-09: ASCENT-07: A phase 3, randomized, open-label study of sacituzumab govitecan versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with HR+/HER2– inoperable, locally advanced, or metastatic breast cancer post-endocrine therapy

Abstract Background: Approximately 70% of all breast cancer (BC) cases are hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2–), with ~65% of these being HR+/HER2-low (immunohistochemistry [IHC]1+, IHC2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]–). Despite an increasing number of available endocrine and targeted treatments for metastatic disease, tumors eventually develop resistance to endocrine therapy (ET). Chemotherapy, the standard of care for patients (pts) whose cancers no longer respond to ET, is associated with poor outcomes, representing a high unmet need in the first-line endocrine-resistant setting. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2–directed antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that delivers SN-38 (the active metabolite of the topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan) to tumor cells via internalization, and to the surrounding tumor microenvironment via the bystander effect. SG demonstrated a significant and clinically meaningful survival benefit in the phase 3, randomized TROPiCS-02 trial, and is approved in the US for inoperable, locally advanced, or metastatic HR+/HER2– BC after ET and ≥ 2 systemic therapies in the metastatic setting. ASCENT-07 will examine the efficacy and safety of SG in the first-line chemotherapy setting, ie, in patients with inoperable, locally advanced, or metastatic ET resistant HR+/HER2– BC. Study design: ASCENT-07 (NCT05840211) is a randomized, open-label, global study evaluating SG versus treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) chemotherapy in pts with HR+/HER2– inoperable, locally advanced, or metastatic BC who have received ET and are eligible for their first chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease. Pts aged ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed HR+/HER2– (HER2 IHC0 or HER2-low [IHC1+, IHC2+/ISH–]) according to ASCO/CAP criteria, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 will be included. Pts are eligible if they meet ≥ 1 of the following criteria: progressive disease (PD) in the metastatic setting on ≥ 2 lines of ET (± targeted therapy) (disease recurrence within the first 24 months of starting adjuvant ET is considered a line of therapy), PD within 6 months of first-line ET (± CDK 4/6 inhibitor) in the metastatic setting, or disease recurrence within 24 months of adjuvant ET with CDK 4/6 inhibitor initiation and no longer a candidate for additional ET. PD on the most recent therapy will be documented by CT or MRI per RECIST v1.1. Key exclusion criteria include prior treatment targeting topoisomerase I. Pts will be randomized to SG 10 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle or TPC (capecitabine, paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1 criteria or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Secondary endpoints include PFS (assessed by the investigator), overall survival, objective response rate and duration of response per BICR and investigator, and quality of life (QoL) assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 cancer questionnaire (primarily change in the Physical Functioning domain at week 16 and time to deterioration in the Global Health Status/QoL domain). Pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity analyses will be undertaken in pts receiving SG. Incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events, including relationship to study drug(s), will be reported. Laboratory and vital signs will be monitored. ASCENT-07 is currently open for recruitment and requires ~654 eligible pts to provide adequate power for assessment of the primary and key secondary endpoints. Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Javier Cortés, Giuseppe Curigliano, Carlos Barrios, Kevin Punie, Yeon Park, Hiroji Iwata, Alex Young, Xuehan Ren, Pelin Cinar, Komal Jhaveri. ASCENT-07: A phase 3, randomized, open-label study of sacituzumab govitecan versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with HR+/HER2– inoperable, locally advanced, or metastatic breast cancer post-endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-05-09.

The role of green tea intake in thromboprophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

BackgroundGreen tea intake has been reported to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with cardiovascular diseases or cancer. It may have a certain role in the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among cancer patients. The current study aimed to address this issue, which has been understudied.MethodsWe carried out a retrospective study to explore the role of green tea intake in cancer patients. Patients with and without green tea intake were enrolled in a 1:1 ratio by using propensity scoring matching. The primary and secondary outcomes were VTE development and mortality 1 year after cancer diagnosis, respectively.ResultsThe cancer patients with green tea intake (n = 425) had less VTE development (10 [2.4%] vs. 23 [5.4%], p = 0.021), VTE-related death (7 [1.6%] vs. 18 [4.2%], p = 0.026), and fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) (3 [0.7%] vs. 12 [2.8%], p = 0.019), compared with those without green tea intake (n = 425). No intake of green tea was correlated with an increase in VTE development (multivariate hazard ratio (HR) 1.758 [1.476–2.040], p &amp;lt; 0.001) and VTE-related mortality (HR 1.618 [1.242–1.994], p = 0.001), compared with green tea intake. Patients with green tea intake less than 525 mL per day had increased VTE development (area under the curve (AUC) 0.888 [0.829–0.947], p &amp;lt; 0.001; HR1.737 [1.286–2.188], p = 0.001) and VTE-related mortality (AUC 0.887 [0.819–0.954], p &amp;lt; 0.001; HR 1.561 [1.232–1.890], p = 0.016) than those with green tea intake more than 525 mL per day. Green tea intake caused a decrease in platelet (p &amp;lt; 0.001) instead of D-dimer (p = 0.297). The all-cause mortality rates were similar between green tea (39 [9.2%]) and non-green tea (48 [11.3%]) intake groups (p = 0.308), whereas the VTE-related mortality rate in the green tea intake group (7 [1.6%]) was lower than that of the non-green tea intake group (18 [4.2%]) (p = 0.026). The incidences of adverse events were similar between the green tea and non-green tea intake groups.ConclusionIn conclusion, the current study suggests that green tea intake reduces VTE development and VTE-related mortality in cancer patients, most likely through antiplatelet mechanisms. Drinking green tea provides the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis for cancer patients.

Safety and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 LYB001 RBD-based VLP vaccine (CHO cell) phase 1 in Chinese adults: a randomized, double-blind, positive-parallel-controlled study

ABSTRACT Background Vaccination remains the cornerstone of defense against COVID-19 globally. This study aims to assess the safety and immunogenicity profile of innovative vaccines LYB001. Research design and methods This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial, in 100 healthy Chinese adults (21 to 72 years old). Three doses of 30 or 60 µg of SARS-CoV-2 RBD-based VLP vaccine (LYB001), or the SARS-CoV-2 RBD-based protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001, control group) were administered with a 28-day interval. Differences in the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and indicators of humoral and cellular immunity among the different groups were measured. Results No severe adverse events were confirmed to be vaccine-related, and there was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the LYB001 and control group or the age subgroups (p > 0.05). The LYB001 groups had significantly higher or comparable levels of seroconversion rates, neutralization antibody, S protein-binding antibody, and cellular immunity after whole vaccination than the control group. Conclusions Our findings support that LYB001 developed on the VLP platform is safe and well tolerated with favorable immunogenicity for fundamental vaccination in healthy adults. Therefore, further larger-scale clinical studies are warranted. Trial Registration This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05552573).

Abstract PO5-01-05: An Open-label, Single-center Study Assessing the Efficacy of PH-based Regimen as Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive Early-stage Breast Cancer: Integrating Genomic Features and Functional Imaging

Abstract Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) has been demonstrated as a surrogate endpoint for disease-free and overall survival in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Trastuzumab (H) plus pertuzumab (P) improved pCR rates in patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer. Nevertheless, biomarkers to assess the effectiveness of this treatment in the neoadjuvant setting are still unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) and 68 Ga-Affibody HER2 Imaging PET (HER2-PET) in HER2 EBC neoadjuvant therapy, and to identify novel biomarkers for this regimen. Methods: HER2-positive EBC patients were prospectively recruited at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between April 2020 and March 2022. All patients received the 1 dose of HP, followed by 6 cycles of docetaxel (T), carboplatin (Cb), and HP. We use FoundationOne to evaluate the genomic alterations before treatment. In addition, 18F-FDG-PET and HER2 PET were performed at baseline, after 1 cycle of HP, and after 6 cycles of TCbHP, to assess the effectiveness of these examinations in the prediction of pCR and correlation to disease burden. All patients were received surgery and completed 1 year of HP-based regimen in the adjuvant setting. Results: A total of 61 patients with a median age of 49 years were included. Among them, 93.5% of patients are node positive. 75.8% of the patients reported adverse events (AEs), primarily grade 1 and 2. The incidence of serious AEs was 6.6%. Patients exhibiting a greater than 40% reduction in SUVmax of 18-FDG-PET or HER2-PET scans from baseline to the fifth day after the initial HP treatment were classified as the treatment-sensitive group. The pCR rate for the 18-FDG-PET-sensitive group was 79.3%, while for the insensitive group was 48.1%. For HER2-PET scans, the pCR rate was 70.0% in the sensitive group and 59.3% in the non-sensitive group. To evaluate the potential biomarkers, 25 patients (13 pCR and 12 non-pCR) were evaluated with FoundationOne, with the identification of 1,321 somatic alterations. The most frequently altered genes were ERBB2 (100%), TP53 (96%), CDK12 (76%), MYC (56%), CCND1 (44%), PIK3CA (40%), and SRSF2 (36%). In the pCR group, we found PPM1D (38.5%) and RAD21 (38.5%) were altered more frequently than the non-pCR group. PIK3CA alterations were significantly reduced in pCR group, only 23% of cases are affected compared to 58.3% in non-pCR group. Patients were non-pCR had more MDM4 (41.7%) and ZNF217 (41.7%) alterations than pCR patients. Conclusion: The SUVmax value of 18-FDG-PET and HER2-PET scans are correlated well with the tumor burden and the residual disease in the HER2 EBCs. The reduction of SUVmax could predict pCR but need further exploration. Patients with alterations in PPM1D and RAD21 have a favorable response to the TCbHP regimen. Conversely, alterations in PIK3CA, MDM4, and ZNF217 are associated with treatment resistance. These results indicate the significance of 18-FDG-PET and HER2-PET in monitoring treatment effectiveness. The biomarker analysis in this study will help us understand the mechanism of HER2 positive breast cancer treatment resistance and assisting in tailoring personalized therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04281641. Citation Format: Ming Chen, Benlong Yang, Sun Yuyun, Linxiaoxi Ma, Song Shaoli, Min He, Zhi-Ming Shao, Bingqiu Xiu, Jiong Wu. An Open-label, Single-center Study Assessing the Efficacy of PH-based Regimen as Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive Early-stage Breast Cancer: Integrating Genomic Features and Functional Imaging [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-01-05.

Abstract PO3-05-07: SOLTI-1718 NEREA Trial: Neratinib in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative HER2-enriched (HER2-E) advanced breast cancer (BC)

Abstract Background Breast cancer (BC) is a clinically and biologically heterogenous disease where intrinsic subtypes play a role. Non-luminal subtypes within HR+/HER2-negative disease do not benefit to the same extent from standard of care treatments as the luminal subtypes. Thus, other strategies are needed. HER2-E subtype represents approximately 15.0% of HR+/HER2-negative tumors in metastatic setting. According to an exploratory analysis of EGF30008 trial, HER2-E advanced BC patients, despite presenting poor outcomes across treatments, showed benefit from anti-HER2 therapy with lapatinib. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of the NEREA trial, the first study designed to evaluate neratinib and endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2-negative, PAM50 HER2-E ABC. Methods SOLTI-1718 NEREA (NCT04460430) is a single-arm, multicenter phase II study evaluating neratinib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with HR+/HER2-, PAM50 HER2-E ABC. Key inclusion criteria include progression to prior endocrine therapy, ≤ 1 line of chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer (ABC), ECOG 0-1, and HER2-E disease by PAM50 on a metastatic tumor biopsy. The availability of a metastatic tumor sample was mandatory in the pre-screening phase to assess PAM50 subtype. Included patients received neratinib 240 mg daily in combination with ET, with either exemestane, fulvestrant or tamoxifen (as per investigator´s decision). All patients received prophylactic loperamide with an established dosing scheme during the first cycle and on-demand in subsequent cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS6). Secondary endpoints include other efficacy endpoints and safety. The study was based on a Simon two-stage design. Stage I of the trial would be considered successful if at least 14 of 33 patients achieved PFS &amp;gt; 6m. In that case, the trial would recruit up to 56 patients for a target PFS6 ≥ 50%. Results. Between July 2020 and June 2022, molecular subtyping was performed on tumors from 136 patients, and 18 HER2-E tumors were identified (7.6%). 12 evaluable patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were as follows: median age 60 years, 91.7% of pts were postmenopausal, 75% had visceral disease and 59% received (neo)adjuvant treatment. The median number of lines for ABC was 3 (1-5). Neratinib was combined with exemestane (41.7%), fulvestrant (33.8%) and tamoxifen (25%). At the time of data cut-off (June 2023), 9 patients (75%) had stopped their treatment because of PD and 2 (16.7%) due to toxicity. The PFS6 months occurred in one patient (8.3%, CI: 0.2% - 38.5%). Median PFS was 1.7 months (95% CI 1.6-1.9) with a patient still on treatment after 27.1 months. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) was 25%; diarrhea (25%), asthenia (16.7%), nausea (8.3%), vomiting (8.3%) and rash (8.3%) were most common and were predominantly grade 1/2. 25% of patients experienced grade 3 trAEs. Conclusions.Due to slow enrollment, the study was stopped early. At the time of study close, the hypothesis that neratinib has efficacy in HR+/HER2-, PAM50 HER2-E tumors was not confirmed. We thank PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC for their provision of Neratinib and financial contribution to the study. Citation Format: Eva Ciruelos, Cristina Saura, Xavier Gonzalez-Farré, Francisco Javier Salvador Bofill, Maria Vidal, Isabel Blancas, Elena López-Miranda, Maria Iglesias, Míriam Arumí, Mireia Margelí, Catarina Pulido, Serafin Morales Murillo, Fernando Henao, Pilar Sanchez, Sara Alves, Ana Godoy Ortiz, José Passos Coelho, Santiago Escrivá-de-Romaní, Alejandra Espinosa, Tomás Pascual, Aleix Prat. SOLTI-1718 NEREA Trial: Neratinib in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative HER2-enriched (HER2-E) advanced breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-05-07.

Abstract PS15-02: A Phase Ⅰb Study of D-0502 as Monotherapy for Advanced or Metastatic ER-Positive and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Results from the Dose-Expansion Stage

Abstract Background: Endocrine therapy is the mainstay treatment for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced breast cancer (BC). D-0502, an orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), has previously demonstrated antitumor activity in various ER-positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer cell lines and xenograft models. The phase Ⅰ open-label study (NCT03471663) evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of D-0502 as monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib in female patients with ER+ and HER2- breast cancer. The dose escalation part of D-0502 monotherapy (phase Ⅰa) has been presented before (SABCS 2021, PS11-26 Abstract #1348). Here, we present the results of D-0502 monotherapy from the dose-expansion stage in phase Ⅰb study. Methods: In the single-agent dose-expansion stage of phase Ⅰb study, patients (n=60) received D-0502 (400 mg QD) in 28-day cycles. Eligible patients included females with confirmed ER+, HER2- locally advanced, or metastatic BC; ECOG 0-1; measurable disease (RECIST v1.1); premenopausal or postmenopausal status; adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal functions. The primary objectives are to characterize the safety of D-0502. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the preliminary anti-tumor activity and the PK characteristic. Results: As of April 07, 2023, 60 female patients were enrolled and treated with 400mg single-agent D-0502. Median age was 57 (range: 32-82) years, 55.0% had an ECOG PS of 1. Disease progression resulting in treatment discontinuation occurred in 66.7% (40/60) of patients, and 6.7% (4/60) of patients discontinued treatment because of AEs. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 57 pts (95.0%), most of which were grade 1-2. No grade 4/5 TRAE has been reported. The incidence of serious adverse events was 6.7% (4/60). The most common (≥ 15%) TRAEs included vomiting, dizziness, nausea, increased aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, anaemia, decreased appetite, diarrhoea, and malaise. In the 51 efficacy evaluable patients, 8 patients had partial response (PR) and 27 had stable disease (SD); objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 15.7% (8/51) and 68.6% (35/51), respectively. The clinical benefit rate (CBR: CR + PR + SD ≥24 weeks) was 47.1% (24/51). The median PFS was 5.6 months (95% Cl: 2.0, 10.0). Conclusion: D-0502 monotherapy showed promising antitumor activity and tolerable toxicity in female patients with ER+ and HER2- locally advanced or metastatic BC. Currently this treatment is being evaluated in a phase Ⅲ study for patients with ER+ and HER2- locally advanced or metastatic BC in China. Citation Format: Jiayu Wang, Tao Sun, Qingyuan Zhang, Yanxia Shi, Xu Wang, Yiding Chen, Quchang Ouyang, Kunyan Li, Manojkumar Bupathi, w. Jeffery Edenfield, Andrea L.M. Silber, Hong Zong, Erika Hamilton, Dejan Juric, Kate Lathrop, Yihong Zhang, Kathryn Stazzone, Zhe Shi, Yaolin Wang, Ling Zhang, Binghe Xu. A Phase Ⅰb Study of D-0502 as Monotherapy for Advanced or Metastatic ER-Positive and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Results from the Dose-Expansion Stage [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS15-02.

Abstract PO2-04-13: TWT-203: PHASE 1b/2 STUDY OF CFI-402257 AS MONOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS AND IN COMBINATION WITH FULVESTRANT IN PATIENTS WITH ER+/HER2- ADVANCED BREAST CANCER AFTER PROGRESSION ON PRIOR CDK4/6 INHIBITORS AND ENDOCRINE THERAPY

Abstract Background: TTK (Threonine Tyrosine Kinase also known as Monopolar spindle 1), is a dual-specificity serine-threonine kinase critical for anaphase promoting complex inhibition at the spindle assembly checkpoint and is required for chromosome alignment and error correction. TTK inhibition results in premature mitosis exiting with unattached chromosomes potentially leading to aneuploidy and cell death. High TTK tumor levels correlate with worse prognosis and contribute to the survival and proliferation of aneuploid cells. CFI-402257, a potent and selective inhibitor of TTK, inhibits the growth of a variety of human cancer-derived cell lines. A first-in-human phase 1 study of CFI-402257 (NCT02792465) demonstrated a tolerable safety profile when enrolled as a monotherapy in solid tumors, and in combination with fulvestrant in hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer1. The dose for expansion was 168 mg, dose limiting toxicity was dose-dependent neutropenia which was manageable and reversible. Investigator-confirmed partial responses (cPR) were observed in 5 pts (8%) with 32 (50.8%) exhibiting disease control. In the HR+/HER2- breast cancer population previously treated with cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and aromatase inhibitors (N=25), there were 4 cPR’s with a median duration of response of 223 days, with responses emerging after 2 cycles of therapy. Responses were observed with CFI-402257 as a single agent and in combination with fulvestrant. Based on these data, study TWT-203 will focus on advanced solid tumors for dose confirmation then focus on advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancers in combination with an approved endocrine therapy. Methods: In TWT-203 study, safety and clinical activity of CFI-402257 monotherapy will be evaluated in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (Part A) or in combination with fulvestrant in pts with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (Part B). Part A will confirm the RP2D using a 3+3 design with a starting dose of 126 mg daily. Part B evaluates CFI-402257 in combination with fulvestrant in pts with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer following progression on prior CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy. Efficacy endpoints include overall response rate and disease control rate. Safety endpoints include incidence of treatment emergent adverse events. Exploratory objectives include characterization of protein and molecular alterations relevant to the cell cycle and CFI-402257 response. Results: At data cutoff of 11 May 2023, 14 pts were enrolled. All received monotherapy treatment. Median treatment duration was 2.1 months (range, 0.2-7.3+). Median age was 67 years (57-76). Median number of prior regimens was 3.5 (2-12). Tumor types enrolled were colorectal (n=6, 43%), breast (3, 21%), and endometrial, hepatocellular, leiomyosarcoma, pancreatic, and sarcoma (1 each, 7%). 4 dose levels, from 126 to 252 mg, were studied. Most pts (12, 86%) experienced ≥1 treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE). More than half of pts (8, 57%) experienced ≥1 treatment related TEAE. Most common TEAEs were fatigue (5, 36%) and nausea (4, 29%). 5 pts (36%) experienced TEAEs grade ≥3, most common were fatigue, neutrophil count decrease, white blood cell count decrease (2 pts each, 14.3%). 1 pt (7%) experienced a serious adverse event (hematuria), not related to study therapy. No patients discontinued treatment due to TEAE. All pts who ended treatment were due to disease progression (8, 57%). No grade 5 TEAEs occurred. No dose limiting toxicities were reported. Disease control rate (CR, PR, or SD ≥ 6 weeks from baseline) was 54.5% (6 pts/11): all achieved SD. 3 of the 6 pts remain on study. Conclusion: CFI-402257 is a potent inhibitor of TTK. It is well tolerated with manageable TEAEs, no dose limiting or treatment limiting toxicities, and no treatment related deaths. Dose expansion in the patient population of interest will commence. 1. John Hilton et al. Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl): P6-10-13. Citation Format: Justin Call, Muralidhar Beeram, Alexander I. Spira, Mark Bray, Dih-Yih Chen, Long Kwei, Emily Roberts-Thomson, Trisha Denny, Roger Sidhu, Robert Wesolowski. TWT-203: PHASE 1b/2 STUDY OF CFI-402257 AS MONOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS AND IN COMBINATION WITH FULVESTRANT IN PATIENTS WITH ER+/HER2- ADVANCED BREAST CANCER AFTER PROGRESSION ON PRIOR CDK4/6 INHIBITORS AND ENDOCRINE THERAPY [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-04-13.